Sure, any loser can make a web site. But do their sites have little pictures of my head on them? No. At least, I hope not.
Get some metal in your inbox
Fri, 12 Jun 2009
Yesterday I did something very cool. You might not think so. If you’re the
sort of person who paraglides, for example. Or leaves the house most days.
But for me: totally exciting.
In the morning, I carried my coffee upstairs to my office and checked my
email. This is almost always a bad idea, but still, hard to resist. I had a message
from Meredith, who said she was very much enjoying Machine Man.
That wasn’t the cool part. Well, it was. It’s always cool when someone
tells you they like something you wrote. It never gets old. But what came next was even
cooler: Meredith was a neuroscience major. She wrote:
I’m surprised he doesn’t have any phantom pain, since that’s extremely common; while the prosthetics would help trick the brain for sure, with that many limbs taken off, he would certainly have pain. No one totally understands phantom pain, but the idea is that our perceptions are not totally sensory; they are, in a large part, just our brain’s best guess. So, basically, the brain guesses that the limb is still there, but you can’t control it (unclench the phantom fist, etc.). A very simple technique has just been developed by Dr. Ramachandran at UCSD that is incredibly successful: Using a $5 drugstore mirror to make the arm that’s still there look like the arm that got cut off. This makes the brain think that what your one arm is doing, the phantom arm is doing. So those with phantom pain can get rid of an uncomfortable position.
I knew of phantom pain, of course, but thus far hadn’t thought of
anything interesting to do with it. Now, thanks to Meredith, I did.
Suddenly phantom pain seemed extremely interesting. So I opened up
a blank page and began writing.
Often people email me interesting things about the subject areas in which
I write. After Company, for example, I heard a lot of
terrific workplace horror stories. Which is great, but I always think, “I
wish I’d heard that two years ago.” Because then I could have used it in
the book.
Yesterday, I sat at my desk with no idea what I would write for that day’s
page, received an email from a neuroscience major, wrote
something based on her insights, and
published it. Then, to make it even
better, the first reader comment (from always-interesting Pev) was:
“Nice research on phantom limb pain, Max.”
This is the kind of research I can dig: the kind other people do for me,
before I even know enough to ask. It’s not the first
time it’s happened with this story. And it’s a totally unexpected
side-benefit of the real-time serial format. I’m loving this.
Mon, 04 May 2009
Seriously:
I’m making this story up as I go. I didn’t say that just to lower your
expectations. It’s a work in progress. I haven’t plotted it out in advance.
I write each page a few days before you see it.
I’d like to believe the reason I keep getting emails like,
“Come on, tell me: how much of this have you written already?”
is that people think
Machine Man is so amazingly brilliant that no mere
mortal could dream it up on the run. Unfortunately, I have to
face the fact that you just think I’m shifty.
So look, I swear: it’s for real. I’ll show you the blank pages I
haven’t written yet.
Anyway. Six weeks in, I’m thrilled. I like the story, I like
checking the latest comments about each page, and
2,700 people have signed up for it. The unsubscription rate is 7%, meaning
93% of people who try it out via email stick with it, which I couldn’t be happier
about. Well, I guess I could. 100% would be better. But maybe that
7% just changed email addresses. Or someone close to them died
and they couldn’t handle any contact from the outside world for a while.
You can’t rule that out.
Now some news:
Machine Man is going to be a book. You know, a real one. My Australian
publisher, Scribe, decided there was no need to wait
to find out whether the rest of the story—i.e. most of it—would
be any good, and offered for print rights. That’s
some pretty good blind faith right there. I’m touched but slightly afraid.
I did
an interview on Machine Man for
LiteraryMinded.
I’m enjoying this enough to see it though, so
the end of the free feed is nigh. I’m thinking Chapter
Ten; i.e. the last free page will be 43. That’s eight and a half weeks in,
which seems about right.
Actually,
page 33 would have been a good place, story-wise, but I hadn’t gotten around
to setting up PayPal. Soon, anyway, you’ll have the
opportunity to pay $6.95 for the rest of the story. If it helps, you can
think of me using that seven bucks to buy shoes for Fin. Look at
her! Right now she has to walk around in baskets.
And a few thoughts:
My favorite chapter so far is
Chapter Five, which contains
my favorite page (20), which
contains my favorite line (“Don’t do that thing.”). I realize this
is something no self-respecting author should ever admit, but that
line made me giggle like a child.
Biggest surprise was the reaction to
page 23. I forgot that
nobody but me knew that Lola was into prosthetics. I mean, really
into them. And people liked this development. Which was
great to discover, you sick bastards.
At the risk of disappointing you by revealing its very
mundane origins:
Page 21 is more or
less the original idea I had for this story. I was walking along
one day when I saw an unattractive man in a beautiful car;
I had a notepad with me and wrote down: The cars are better
than the drivers. I thought about this while waiting for the
train, at which point I added: I want to be a train,
which is essentially page 2.
The rest follows naturally, I’m sure you’ll agree.
P.S. In case you’re worried about that picture, we don’t actually force
Fin to dress from head to toe in
pink and put on a tiara. We just can’t stop her.
Mon, 20 Apr 2009
Forgive me, but I need to get this off my chest. I am a
Richmond Tigers fan.
That’s a football team. And by football, I mean Australian Rules. I don’t
want to get into a whole debate about which football code is best,
but it’s this one. Let’s just stipulate that and move on.
I began following the Tigers when I was about eight. Looking back, I think
it was the exact moment they transitioned from a
league powerhouse to the most spectacularly unsuccessful football team
of the last quarter-century. I love the Tigers, but so far the journey has
comprised three or four moments of ecstasy in an ocean of misery
and despair.
Currently we are at the bottom of the ladder, with zero wins. We are probably
about to sack our coach. I have been a strong supporter of our coach
over the last five years, because he is smart. Our previous
coach was not smart, and that didn’t work out so well. So this was a
refreshing change.
But now I’m
thinking smart is overrated. It’s useful. But it doesn’t seem to be
as important to winning games as other qualities; in particular, being Terrifying
and Lovable.
Because
I woke at 5AM this morning and couldn’t go back to sleep, I decided to rate
AFL coaches on those three dimensions. I scored a coach highly on
Terrifying if he is combative in interviews, physically intimidating, and
generally looks seconds away from pushing somebody’s head
through a wall. He scored Lovable points if he is the sort of bloke I
would want to share a beer with or invite home for dinner. And I awarded
Wily points if he is clever and tactical, both on match day and in the media.
(Incidentally, my first thought was to rate coaches based on how many Google
hits their names returned when coupled with relevant words. But I
couldn’t find ones that worked. The word “tough,” for example, occurs
frequently in articles about Richmond, but in contexts like “tough season,”
“tough luck,” and “Convincing anyone to coach this club will be tough.”)
It turned out that Terrifying was about twice as important as Lovable in
terms of modeling a coach’s success, and Lovable in turn was about twice
as important as Wily. This explained a lot for me. Richmond’s current
coach, Terry Wallace, is very Wily, but not very Terrifying, and a little
too self-interested to be Lovable. Our previous coach, Danny Frawley, was very
Lovable, but neither Terrifying nor Wily. And I suspect Lovable can only
take you so far: if you keep losing games, you probably become rapidly less
Lovable. Those coaches who have a significant impact in their first year or
two, then are powerless to stop their team sinking down the ladder: I think
they’re Lovable coaches losing their shine. And one more thing: this
accounts for the vogue toward younger coaches. “Lethal” Leigh Matthews,
an extremely successful coach over many years who was nonetheless replaced
last year, was one of the most physically
intimidating men the game ever produced,
but at 57, he wasn’t getting any more Terrifying.
Based on this, I hope Richmond’s next coach will be Nathan Buckley. I have no idea
whether he’s any chop as a tactician, but he seems like a really decent,
stand-up guy who might, if you annoy him, tear off your arms. Perfect.
Thu, 09 Apr 2009
I
don’t want to freak you out, but MY DAUGHTER’S STRUCTURAL
INTEGRITY HAS BEEN BREACHED. Her bones have bent. One has cracked.
She has broken her arm.
It happened at an indoor play center, one of those technicolor places with dizzying
heights and terrifying drops, trampolines that launch children through the air like
patriot missiles and treacherous plastic balls that sneak out of pits to slip
beneath tiny sneakers. Naturally, Fin navigated these with contemptuous ease, then tripped over
her own feet on a stretch of flat carpet. Exactly how you break an arm falling
two and a half feet onto shag pile, I don’t know. But she wailed like… well, like she’d
just broken her arm. When this didn’t abate, and I noticed her arm dangling
at her side like a wet noodle, I began to suspect something was wrong. I sprang into
action, demanding a refund from the play center. Well, it was five bucks. And we’d
only just arrived. I don’t see why I should have to pay five bucks for eight minutes
of fun, followed by a broken bone. They gave it to me, too, plus a voucher for
a free coffee my next visit, in 4-6 weeks.
As soon as that was taken care of, I carried my screaming three-year-old
daughter straight out of there. I didn’t have a car, so I bore her in my arms to
the nearest hospital. I don’t want to claim I was a hero, but if anyone wants to
make a movie of my life, that would be a really moving scene. I think there could
be an operatic sound track at that point. That’s just a thought.
Fin stopped crying the second we stepped into the Emergency Room, which was a shame,
because they decided she wasn’t urgent and told us to go to another hospital.
I was tempted to pinch her, in the interests of securing prompt medical attention.
But that might have been a difficult moment to explain in the movie. So off
we went to the Royal Children’s Hospital, where they X-rayed her, pulled her bones
straight, and encased her arm in plaster.
Let me tell you about this process. I’ll tell you the same way Dr. Elliot explained it to me,
right before he began to inflict excruciating pain on my daughter: “We’ll give
her some gas. It’s not for pain relief. What it does is block the formation of short-term
memory, so when it’s over, she won’t remember what it was like.”
Now, I don’t want to criticize Dr. Elliot. He is a smarter, better-educated guy than me,
and no doubt across the many excellent medical reasons why this is the optimum
course of action for children. But if they suggested this idea to an adult
patient, that person would PUNCH THE DOCTOR RIGHT IN THE MOUTH. Is this not
the most horrible concept you have ever heard? “We won’t block your pain. We’ll
just make you forget it afterward. It’s basically the same thing.” NO IT’S NOT.
Option A: no pain. Option B: TONS OF PAIN. That’s the difference.
Fin sucked on that gas like she was drinking it. Dr. Elliot pulled her bones straight.
“Daddy,” she cried out. “Daddy, I want you.” I squeezed her free hand and told her it
was all right, and a few seconds later she had forgotten all about it. When they
were finished, she smiled and said, “I like this hospital.”
I hope that creeps you out as much as it did me.
P.S. Sorry to everyone who was mailed an old blog the other day. The gnomes
who live in the web server and hand-address all the emails got into the alcohol
cupboard and—oh, it was a real mess. I have replaced them with goblins
and everything should work fine now.
Wed, 25 Mar 2009
A writer friend emailed me about Machine Man:
I’ve managed to get to the FAQ, but am I REALLY
supposed to believe what you have posted there?
I think he means that writing is a good way to send yourself
insane before you ask everyone in the world to watch you work
and post comments. True, it’s not a method I’d generally recommend.
It’s essential to stay excited about a work-in-progress, and there
may be no better way to deflate yourself about a promising story
than to show it to people before it’s ready.
But I am a big boy. And I did set expectations before I started:
this isn’t a plotted, edited, polished book. This is me caught in the act
of making sausages. I think everyone understands that.
Ha ha ha! No, of course they don’t. And nor should you: all that really
matters is whether the story is worth reading.
One week in, this is what I’ve found:
You people don’t miss a thing. Upon posting
Page 4,
I was
immediately slammed
by multiple readers for
being repetitive, unimaginative, and suggesting that straight hair
can dangle. This is slightly terrifying, because no doubt Page 4 is a lot
better than some others I’ll serve up. But it’s also instructive.
I think Machine Man is good training for me in the same
way as a boot camp commander who makes you crawl through mud
while screaming insults about your mother. They’re both… uh…
character-building.
I am getting a lot of love for this project, which is flat-out
wonderful. It’s thrilling to watch a page go up and read comments
about it. Scary. But thrilling. There is usually a gap of several
years between me giggling to myself in my study over a line, and
anyone outside my immediate friends and family reading it. That
immediacy of reaction is kind of addictive. Thanks.
Long-time
meta-blogger Adam
wrote:
I wonder what would happen if every day I tried to predict what will
happen on the next page. I feel like it would really screw with Max as a writer.
Ha ha ha! It sure would! Although that is a fascinating thing for me: I have always wished
I could stick probes in your brain to see how you react as you read my stories.
Are you buying this particular subplot? Do you care? Did you notice that
foreshadowing before; was that too obvious, or too subtle? Usually I
have to bug Jen about these things. Here I feel closer to
getting an answer to the eternal question: How does this book look when it’s
inside your head?
Quite a few people seem frustrated at the one-page-per-day drip-feed. I’m not
sure whether this is good frustration (“I love this story so much, I can’t
wait for pages!”) or bad frustration (“In the 24 hours between each page, I totally
forget everything that happened!”). I guess a little of each. I’m enjoying this format
very much, but will wait and see how well it works for readers over the long-term.
GMail is really popular. Which is not particularly relevant, but wow: almost half of all subscribed
email addresses are at gmail.com. Hotmail is a very distant second. There are
about 1,500 people signed up to Machine Man at the moment, with… huh.
I just double-checked my numbers, and it’s exactly 1,500 people.
That’s a little weird. Anyway, 1,500 people, with three-quarters getting it
via email and the rest via RSS. There might be others reading pages on the site
without subscribing.
Since it’s been a happy beginning,
I’ve decided to start a
new Machine Man feed every Wednesday.
So if you
only stumbled across this concept today, you can still get Machine Man delivered
starting from
Page 1!
Feel free to tell your friends about that.
Tue, 17 Mar 2009
Machine Man launches tomorrow! Which is also my birthday. Yeah, thanks for
noticing. No, no, don’t try to make excuses. It only demeans us both.
Speaking of which: Machine Man! I hope you’re
signed up for this
spectacular venture into real-time serial fiction. I say “spectacular” because
“I wound up writing a 200-page story for eight interested readers” would qualify
too, albeit not in the sense I’m hoping for. But either way.
Because the original concept wasn’t self-destructive enough, I decided
each Machine Man page will accept your comments. That way, my eight interested
readers can not only bankrupt me financially, but also destroy my
creative confidence.
There’s a very real chance
here you may see me totally disintegrate as a human being. And I’ll throw
that in for nothing.
Get Machine Man here.
P.S. I have to confess: I’ve cheated a little already. I got ahead of myself and
built up a little stack of pages, which are now ready to go. It has been fun.
There is something very satisfying about a solid, ninety-word scene. I think
I like this medium. It’s like a novel with ADHD.
P.P.S. I got a spam email from “Mal Awesome.” That’s the best name
I’ve ever heard. Next time I need a character name, I’m trawling my Junk
folder.
Wed, 04 Mar 2009
I’ve never
loved the idea of reading a novel online, because novels aren’t meant to
be read that way: they are designed to envelop you. Anything I see on
the web, by contrast, I give my attention for a maximum of eight seconds before
checking Reddit for videos of laughing dogs. Don’t say that’s just me.
It’s how the internet trains us.
So rather than trying to shoe-horn a novel into a web-friendly format,
I thought I’d write you a real-time serial. That means a continuing story
that turns up one tiny page at a time in your inbox. It is titled
“Machine Man.”
I say “real-time” because I will write it as you read it. I’m
warning you about this up-front because it’s going to be a little chaotic,
and Hemingway was right.
Also there is the possibility that it will go so badly I nuke this
part of the web site and pretend it never happened. But it’s the web,
right? So I will release early and release often.
Right now you can sign up for free. If it goes well, I’ll turn it into
a subscriber thing where you can buy the whole thing for $6.95.
Pages start Wednesday March 18, 2009. You can
find out more here.
I hope you like it.
P.S. I’m not sure if anyone’s done anything quite like this before. If they
have, and it was a disaster, please don’t tell me.
P.P.S. Special thanks/blame to Ian for
haranguing me into doing this.
Mon, 16 Feb 2009
I have a problem. Lately I’ve been happy with my writing; I don’t want
to make a whole big thing out of it, but the words have
been good words. I like them. They make me happy. One day, not too
long from now, I hope other people will see them, and be happy, too.
I haven’t mentioned this recently—by “recently,” I mean, “for the last
18 months”—because I got myself into the slightly embarrassing situation
of
publicly
declaring my excitement for a book that, in retrospect,
didn’t quite deserve it. I don’t think I had gone through the essential
“falling out of love” stage, which must occur so that an author can
stop making goo-goo eyes at her new baby and start dismembering it,
to build a new body around the interesting parts.
Also, I figured it’s frustrating to hear an author talking about how
great his writing is going when he’s not putting out any frickin’ books.
But clearly this has backfired—or at least run its course. I first got
an inkling when a friend sent me a podcast on “Writers and
Procrastination.” Then there were the growing number of emails and
comments, like this one from Ian:
What do you do all day?
I read Twilight for frack sake.
I’m so bored.
And you….watch movies and grow facial hair?
Books! WRITE BOOKS!
Short stories…..anything
People think I’m not doing anything. It’s a little strange,
because if I’m on book tour for some paperback edition, people seem to
figure I’m at least keeping busy. But if I bunker down and write, they
assume I’m sipping daiquiris in the Bahamas.
I decided to tally up the number of words of fiction I’ve ever written.
It’s 1.5 million. My finished novels tend to wind up around 80,000 words, so
that’s about 19 books. Since Company, I’ve written about half
a million words, the equivalent of seven novels.
But not seven good novels. I’m a pathological rewriter: I believe that
if a book hasn’t had more words cut from it than it is long, it needs more work.
Right now, I have quite a lot of fiction that is promising. Some of it
is almost there. But not quite.
And I do not want to give you a bad novel. I never want to do that.
So here is my problem. Even if I escorted a manuscript to my publisher
tomorrow, it would be a year, minimum, before that thing reaches your
hands. It would make you happy, I think. But it’s a long time to wait. It’s
too long.
So I am going to do something. I know what the something is. It will be good.
And it will be in March.
Fri, 06 Feb 2009
I got into big trouble with my brother for
that anti-ginger blog.
“You’re just like Hitler,”
he said, or might as well have. “It’s not 1935, you know. Demonizing
people for aspects of their appearance they can’t control: we’re not doing
that any more.”
“Steady on,” I protested. “It was just harmless good fun. Besides,
the point was I’m a ginger when I grow
a moustache. That’s what made it funny.”
“I suppose you think Auschwitz would have been fine, if only
Hitler was Jewish,” my brother argued, more or less. “I suppose you think
it would have been hilarious.”
I suspected that my brother, or at least this version of him I was
exagerating for comic effect, was getting carried away. But he did have
a point. “Redheads are one of the few remaining groups it’s still
socially acceptable to ridicule,” he said, and dammit, he was right.
I had been so enraptured with the possibilities for jokes when I
started sprouting gingers, I didn’t stop and think. My moustache
was gone, but the dark moustache on my soul would not be shaved
so easily.
“History is full of red-headed achievers,” he said. “You just never
hear about them. Thomas Jefferson. James Joyce. Galileo. Malcolm X.”
“Malcolm X!? Are you sure?”
“Check it out
for yourself.”
“Wow,” I said. “Maybe that’s why he was so angry.”
“You’re doing it again.”
“But I’m a ginger.”
“Let me explain this to you one more time.”
But seriously. Redheads rock. I love you guys. If I could grow long, amber locks,
I’d be all over that. I’d let my beautiful red hair flow down to my shoulders and
smell it every night before I went to sleep. Right now, I’ve got nothing. The difference
between a red-haired guy and me is that he has options.
Thu, 01 Jan 2009
If an infinite number of monkeys working on an infinite number of
typewriters will eventually produce the complete works of Shakespeare,
a sufficiently powerful computer could auto-generate random combinations
of letters, numbers, punctuation, sounds, and pixel maps,
until it owns the copyright on every work of art that could ever be created.
One application of this machine would be to generate income
by suing popular artists. Another would be to render all future art illegal.
Since going about your everyday life would inadvertently
create an unauthorized performance of a copyrighted work, it would be
illegal to do anything, at least
for 120 years, except act out old books and films that had already
entered the public domain.
Happy New Year!
Older posts »